Football, 1/4 of the way through the season.

If you had started the season predicting the Skins and Giants on top of the NFC East and the Eagles and Cowboys at the bottom, I would have called you a fool. Shows what I know about football. Of course I can’t say I’m displeased, but I’ve watched every Giants game this season including the preseason, and they’re not a good football team. Their troubles are as much about injuries as they are about talent and coaching, but even if everyone was on the field, my read is they’re a middle of the pack team that needs help on defense (linebacking and secondary) and on offense (the line primarily, though it’s unclear if any of their receivers can step up and become the goto playmaker that Smith was and Plaxico was before him).

It’s too early to make predictions I have confidence in, and there’s the whole on any given sunday thing, but barring a string of injuries the Packers look even better than they did last season and an easy pick for NFC champs. I haven’t seen enough AFC games to have an informed opinion, but I’ll go with the Pats  and their explosive offense in the AFC.

How the brain mediates perception

There was a great piece in a recent New Yorker that had a journalist following a brilliant young neuroscientist around chatting about his varied interests and research. The piece covered a lot of ground and there were a number of really great observations and insights into how the brain mediates perception. I’d long known that the system processes latency (signals in your nerves take time to travel from the point of reception to the brain – it takes longer for a pain signal to reach your brain from your toe than from your cheek for example) by mediating your sense of time so that things appear to happen instantly when in fact they don’t. Turns out this is just the tip of the iceberg – the brain edits more out than I knew. The piece offered a great little experiment you can conduct to see evidence of your brain doing this. Imagine you were watching someone else look into a mirror,  and that person was looking at their eyes, changing their focus from their left eye to their right eye repeatedly. You would see their eyes move as they changed focus. You can film yourself doing this and see it happen. Now go look in a mirror. Look from your right eye to your left eye repeatedly. You will never see your eyes move. They do move. Your brain just filters it out of your conscious perception, presumably as extraneous detail, much as it does with the majority of sensory input you experience as you move through the world. On the one hand, banal, right? On the other, it’s a bit mind blowing to think about how you’re walking around with this subconscious editorial process constantly firing on all cylinders. Why don’t I get to make these choices! (a possible answer is that some people can, or have an altered editorial filter. We call them insane). Anyway, fascinating stuff and I loved the simple little test you can do to see this in action.

So how would you fence a goat?

We have around 3 acres of land now, most of it grass. I spend 5-6 hours a week mowing. We also have a barn with 4 stalls. Given these facts, Susan and I have been kicking around the idea of getting goats/sheep/alpaca that would help keep the grass trimmed, clear some of the land, and maybe produce hair for spinning and knitting. There’s also something of a principle at work here, which involves us working the land and trying to produce some of what we use locally ourselves. Mowing is a waste, but cleared land is an opportunity – for an acre of asparagus, or of sunflowers, or a bunch of goats, an acre of fruit or nut trees, or even just a field of wildflowers. We have several issues to deal with before we get there though, including getting water out to the barn (we’re thinking we’ll get a hand pump well drilled, since there’s a vernal pool nearby suggesting there’s ample groundwater close below) and how to contain the animals.

The well seems straightforward, but the fencing turns out to be complicated. There’s lots of ways to fence livestock. We could pay for or build permanent wooden, plastic or metal fencing. We could use horse panels, which are basically stiff steel wire fence panels with large rectangular holes, and move the animals around along with the fencing every couple of days. We could use corral panels, which are steel tube fencing panels which are sturdier than the horse panels but much more expensive. We could use movable plastic ribbon electric fence, which use plastic rods with foot pedals on them that you reposition periodically. Or we could do something we haven’t thought of yet. What would you do were you us? Permanent fencing doesn’t appeal much because of the cost and the lack of flexibility. Horse panels leave me nervous that I’m going to be chasing down escaped goats all the time. Corral panels seem pretty expensive (they run ~$8-10 a foot). The plastic ribbon fence is an eye sore and a lot of work to move around, plus even though they can use solar power, they do require the power. Basically, we’re not loving any of the options and debating what to do. Anyone else got an opinion they want to share, or other options?

Minecraft plus Studio Ghibli plus time = brilliance

So you have to be a nerds nerd to really appreciate this but man, if you fit the bill, this is fantastic. This:

Is the worlds imagined by Studio Ghibli as recreated by a bunch of folks using the Minecraft engine.

If you’re unfamiliar with Studio Ghibli, stop what you’re doing and go watch Laputa, Castle in the Sky, or Grave of the Fireflies, or Porco Rosso, or, well, anything they’ve done, but especially those. Shorthand explanation would be that they’re a Japanese analog to Walt Disney.

If you’re unfamiliar with Minecraft, and you have a computer that’s less than 6-7 years old that can run Java, go spend the $15 or so to register. It’s a 3d lego toolkit with world generation, multiplayer, and zombies, plus a whole lot more, but that should be enough right there. Plus it’s absolutely brilliant.

Pet peeve: historical perspective in fantasy and science fiction

I read a lot of fantasy and science fiction. I cannot say how many times I’ve run across a passage like this in a fantasy novel:

…and the Night’s Watch had a proud tradition of protecting the King for over 2,000 years,

or this from science fiction:

…a galaxy spanning civilization that had endured over 5,000 years…

Here’s the thing: we humans can’t state with much certainty what happened to us a couple of thousand years ago, and generalizing, we can’t say much about what happened earlier than that with any specificity. There is nothing to suggest that anything we produce, from structures, to works of art, to political institutions, to societies, has much chance of surviving more than a few hundred years at best. And yet epic fantasy and science fiction are replete with examples of passages like the above, with authors imagining societies that have persisted statically for millennium only to be disrupted by the events depicted in the novels.

I get that I’m nitpicking forms which by their nature are intended to entertain us by challenging our sense of how things work, but it just doesn’t scan, especially in fantasy. If you could spend some time explaining to me how a society remained stuck as a feudal state for 6,000 years (and even be aware of the passage of that many years), or at least offer some clues as to why, or even wave your hands about and blame it on ‘magic,’ great, maybe I can look past it, and sometimes authors even try to do this. Most of the time though, they don’t (and as far as I can recall anyway, even when they try I haven’t come close to buying it). They want to imagine some grand civilization on the precipice of change and imbue this with a sense of drama and poignancy implied by just how long these institutions have stood, but instead it just comes across as bombastic and silly.

TL;DR: Fantasy and Science fiction authors: please read some history and get a more realistic sense of scale for human endeavors. ‘Fantasy’ is not the same as ‘impossible.’

New pictures of Brady

While I haven’t spent much time on this, Susan is a trooper and continues to add new photos to our image gallery. Those will appear on the right column of this site, but in case you missed any lately because I haven’t been pinging Facebook with them, there’s a new gallery for Brady’s 5th month here, and here’s one of my favorites from this month, featuring 4 generations of Kimballs:

Brady meeting his Great Grandmother at her 90th Birthday party

Re-activating the blog

So who knew having 1.5 jobs and a new baby would keep me from using this site much? Probably everyone but me. Truth is though the main thing that’s kept me from posting here has to do with Facebook. Well, Facebook and a lack of time to deal with the issues. Basically I had connected this site to my Facebook wall so that anything I posted here would show up there, but I’ve become increasingly disenchanted with Facebook to the point where I don’t want much to do with them, so I needed to disconnect the site. On the occasions when I’ve had time to deal with that I either wasn’t at a machine where I could do it (I only allow a virtual machine at work to connect to them at this point), or I bounced off the changes they made to their interface and backed out. Yesterday I finally took the time to disconnect things. The intent is to return to using this space. We’ll see if I can live up to it.

The littlest Giants fan

The littlest New York Giants fan

Latest in a series. I’ve been doing a bad job keeping this updated, but Susan’s been plugging away at it, uploading new photos of Brady on a regular basis to the image gallery on this site. She started month three of the gallery not long ago – check it out here.

(Thanks, btw, to the Lord family for the awesome giants getup. There’s also a bib that he’s not wearing in this shot).