Game Finished: Tomb Raider (2013 edition)

Summary: Tomb Raider is a fantastic reboot of the long-lived and somewhat uneven Tomb Raider series that’s worth a playthrough if you’re a fan of character driven action games.

The good: Great graphics, imaginatively realized setting featuring grand sense of scale, workmanlike but serviceable plot, good voice acting. Strong combat and exploration gameplay systems. Game engine is impressive technically and the PC port is solid.

The bad: More Uncharted than Tomb Raider – didn’t bother me, might bother you. Puzzles are mostly trivial, in part thanks to lots of hand holding. Normal difficulty is pretty easy. Occasionally feels like you’re playing through beautiful cut scenes that require minimal player input.

Graphics and sound: The graphics and sound are both top notch. The graphics in particular shine here, especially the huge vistas. Audio and voicework are both good. Some nice weather/wind effects, good use of lighting and motion blur effects as well.

Everything else: Before I get started, a word about the controversy surrounding the game when it was released. Much was made of how many graphically depicted awful things happen to the game’s protagonist. Lara’s a woman, and there were allegations of misogyny. My take is that, first of all, awful things, truly awful things, have been happening to Lara since the first game (death by lion maw, bear paw, boulders the size of a compact car to the head, gunshots to parts various and sundry, spike traps to the legs,and falls from great heights onto granite floors all featured in the first game alone), and the only thing different in this game is how vividly they’re depicted thanks to a modern game engine. Second of all, videogames in general, not to mention popular cinema and television, all feature horrific violence, often quite graphic. Using the game’s release to have a conversation about the broader issue of depictions of violence in popular culture seems fair enough; calling out the game for somehow being outside the norm, or unfairly beating up on a woman, do not. Male protagonists, more common in games by many orders of magnitude, suffer all Lara does and worse, and videogame producers are frequently criticized for failing to offer up female protagonists. Then someone does, and they get beat up for…beating up on her the way they do on male protagonists. Most of the criticism I’ve seen wasn’t speaking to the broader cultural issues, it was criticizing Tomb Raider specifically. They created a game featuring a heroine who overcomes a bunch of horrific stuff, finding her inner strength whilst triumphing over evil and saving the day, and their reward is to be labeled misogynist bastards. Clearly they should stick to games with male protagonists, because daggers to the ear are ok, if it’s a guy’s ear.

[in other words, I call myopic hypocritical bullshit]

That said, about the game: I loved it and played through it in less than 2 weeks, which is almost unheard of for me. I can quibble with some of the design choices, and agree with critics who say there’s not as much player agency available here as one might want, but my complaints pale in comparison to the game’s virtues. This is an entertaining, well crafted game. I can most easily describe it as Tomb Raider meets Uncharted, with a side helping of rpg-lite. It’s a reboot of the long running series, and begins with a young Lara with friends and colleagues on an anthropological vessel searching for a lost culture. Things quickly go bad, and soon Lara finds herself in harms way, questing to save her friends and get to the bottom of why they find themselves unable to escape a quasi devil’s triangle scenario. Gameplay features a really well paced mix of plot exposition via cutscene, exploration and physical puzzle solving, cover-reliant gunplay, hand to hand combat, and light role playing mechanics.

The plot and exposition is the weakest part of the mix, but it’s better than the majority of videogame offerings. There’s a diverse collection of characters, a few of whom actually emerge as believable, and the plot itself is a decent hash of action adventure film tropes with a dash of the occult. Lara and friends end up shipwrecked on a mysterious island and soon discover something’s keeping them from leaving. Not only that, the island hosts several factions of previous shipwreck victims, some of whom may be up to cultish no-good, and most of whom end up chasing after or being chased by Lara. Plot exposition is conveyed via non-interactive game engine cutscenes. I usually hate this model, but found I enjoyed this more than most and rarely wanted to skip through them as I often do in lesser games.

The exploration and puzzle solving is engaging and looks fantastic. It’s a bit on the easy side though, particularly compared to the (admittedly fiddly) original Tomb Raider games. Lara quickly becomes more agile than a rhesus monkey, and it’s rare for her to fail as she clambers, slides, leaps and otherwise maneuvers through the game’s environments. And oh, those environments. There’s some really stunning stuff on offer, from asian temples dotted along steep, forested cliffs looking out over the sea, to smoky cavern systems populated with things that go boo in the night, to a you have to see it to believe it WWII-era shipyard suspended in the sky via steel cables. The environments are full of hidden areas and a variety of types of discoverable objects, many of which contribute experience points Lara can use to enhance her weapons and skills. Puzzles are really simple, often featuring physics challenges like ‘to get past this wooden door, I have to swing this metal bell that’s conveniently hanging right next to it till it bashes through’. To make it even easier, that bell will glow whenever you push the ‘environmental cues’ button, aka the ‘give me a hint button’, which you can use whenever you like. Did I mention the puzzles were easy? There are also innumerable ‘explore area, jumping, climbing, sliding, crawling, etc, poking nose into every nook and difficult to reach cranny in order to pull the lever/push switch/disable door lock to open access to the next area’ style puzzles which have been standard for this series since the beginning. These occasionally feature simple QTE (ie push the right button at the right time) challenges, but it’s always the same button with the same timer, so they become trivial after the first couple of them.

The combat is a mixed bag. It’s competent, moves quickly and fluidly, and looks great, but it’s also really easy and for reasons I can’t quite put my finger on feels a bit…dry. It’s a third person cover-based shooter at heart, much like Uncharted but with not as much emphasis on hand to hand combat. There are only a handful of weapons in the game, all of which can be upgraded using experience points Lara accumulates over the course of the game. By the end all of them are so powerful that only bosses stand a chance against them, and that’s because they’re mostly immune to them and use similar easy to time QTE challenges some of the exploration challenges feature. On balance, I enjoyed it but found it a bit lacking.

The rpg elements are pretty linear and trivial. As you explore the game’s environments you find and accumulate material which you can use to enhance Lara’s equipment. Periodically you also find blueprints which allow you to raise specific pieces of equipment to a new more powerful tier, so for example your simple bow made from a stick and some vine that you start with has become a sophisticated compound bow that can fire fire or explosive tipped arrows with great speed and accuracy. You can similarly upgrade Lara’s skills in a few areas, like mobility, speed of climbing, and the efficacy of her ‘environmental cues’ skill. I didn’t dislike this element but it didn’t feel fully fleshed out.

I should note there’s also a multiplayer component to the game. I haven’t even bothered to try it, mostly because I’m well stocked on excellent PC multiplayer games (Team Fortress 2 and Planetside 2 are both getting played by me a lot these days) and don’t need another one. I find I’m generally in the camp of gamers who don’t believe you have to tack a multiplayer mode onto every game you release – focus your resources on making one or the other really well. It’s easy to forgive here because the singleplayer is so fun.

I recognize I seem overly critical above, but the bottom line is despite all my quibbling, I had a great time playing through this game and look forward to new entries in the series.


Tomb Raider is worth the full retail price, even if you don’t care about the multiplayer.


Friday Fun Link – Forget-Me-Not

Check out Forget-Me-Not, a tough as nails riff on the gameplay mechanics of the arcade games of the 80’s. It’s free on Windows and OSX and $1.99 for iOS. I bought it on the phone but didn’t like it because it’s hard to control on a touchscreen. No such difficulty with a keyboard though and you can’t beat free. Gameplay is a combo of pac man-esque pellet munching, simple shooting mechanics, and maze escape. Did I mention it’s tough? Remember – you can (and will) shoot yourself, and that’s not a good thing. Gameplay video:

Just my luck: no functioning consoles

So my primary hobby is gaming, and I spend a fair amount of time and money on it. What are the odds that in the same timeframe Sony Playstation’s PSN service would go down for a month+ due to being hacked, and my just over 3 year old (read: just out of warranty) xbox 360 would Red Ring of Death? 100% likely as it turns out. Just a couple of days after the PSN network blew up, my Xbox died as I sat down to watch a movie on it. I’m especially pissed about the xbox because I intentionally held off buying one for several years because the RROD issue became well known and I decided to hold off for a hardware revision, assuming Microsoft would address the issue. They didn’t. Supposedly it’s addressed in the newest ‘slim’ models (I bought an Elite shortly after they came out), but at this point, having had my first generation xbox die and now my 360 die, I’m not so sure I want to buy back into the platform. It’s a real dilemma though, because I have literally dozens of games for the thing, as well as many peripherals (the controllers alone go for $50/pop and I have 4 of them), and selling everything off will earn me pennies on the dollar. Plus, I’m figuring my soon-to-be toddler would enjoy the Kinect motion control stuff MS is pushing these days.

So…what to do. I can’t decide. I’m sitting pat for now. E3, the biggest gaming industry trade show, is next month, and I’m going to see what comes out of that before doing anything.  I should note that while the PS3 still works, mostly, aside from multiplayer, I’m worried trophies won’t sync correctly when the network comes back up, so I’ve been staying off of it. Meantime, it’s back to gaming on the PC primarily.

Game finished: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

I was surprised how much I liked this game. I finished it on the PS3 over the weekend. On paper, you’d think I would hate this game – there’s not a lot of variety in terms of the enemies you face, by and large it’s a slightly disguised corridor crawler, the graphics are pretty good but the framerate can get low at times, some of the boss battles are really tedious (Gambit, who you fight like 97 times), it’s incredibly repetitive, you can exploit the combat system (grabs are really powerful) and there are a number of annoying scripted quicktime events (ie you have to press the correct button or sequence of buttons at the correct time). The game has two really important things going for it though – the combat is fast and fluid and an absolute blast (and it’s what you spend 99% of the game doing) , and the game captures the essence of Wolverine as ruthless baddass more than any game ever has. It’s one of the best superheroes in tights videogames ever. *

The game loosely follows the plot of the recent (mediocre, I thought) film, fleshing out various areas of the plot with more opportunities for combat and adding in a huge section of flashback material that’s only slightly touched on in the film, but it also strays far afield in parts. The game’s actually up for an award for the script which surprised me when it was announced – not that the game’s script is terrible or anything, it’s above average for this genre but really, that’s not saying much. If you haven’t seen the film, it’s basically an origin story but it jumps around in time a fair bit to tell the story.

Gameplay wise it’s an arcade brawler at heart, with a thin veneer of rpg layered on which allows you to increase the power, number, and styles of attacks, recuperative powers, and special abilities Wolverine has as the game progresses. There’s also some light collectathon stuff going on in the form of dogtags on the corpses of fallen comrades and wolverine statues which unlock challenge missions.

The game’s sort of the videogame equivalent of junkfood – nothing beyond capturing the essence of Wolverine is done especially well in this game, most of the gameplay systems are mediocre riffs on mechanics you’ve seen before, but on the whole it comes together as a fun little brawler.

Below is a video of one of my favorite sections of the game, wherein Wolverine manages to take down a Sentinel. Few things will make you feel more baddass than that 😉

* One caveat here – I have not yet played Batman: Arkham Asylum yet, and it’s supposed to be even better.